Reflecting on the Engineering Issues at Chernobyl 34 Years Later

By: Marie McCarthy

2020 marks 34 years since the horrific nuclear disaster at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant on April 26, 1984. That day, an inexperienced night shift crew was supervising a safety test that was meant to simulate an electric power outage. During the test, power levels dipped dangerously low and the crew tried to restore it, but their efforts destabilized the reactor. The reactor’s instability coupled with its flawed design caused an explosive reaction. The result was the release of superheated cooling water and nuclear, radioactive materials that descended, by some accounts, throughout all of continental Europe.

Dozens were killed from the initial explosion and some researchers say thousands died of complications indirectly linked to the release of radioactive materials. The incident is considered one of the worst of its kind in history. As engineers look back upon the tragedy, they hope to learn lessons to prevent future disasters.

Australia’s Engineering Institute of Technology says there were a few things that “went wrong” that day: they say there was a “deficit when it came to process control” and the Soviet Union’s prevailing societal belief to put faith in the worker came at a costly extent because a less-experienced team was overseeing the safety of the test.

They also point out that the crew did not follow safety procedures, specifically running the plant at dangerously low power. In a July 2009 article titled “Chernobyl Did Not Need to Occur,” Bela Liptak says properly designed process controls could have averted the disaster.

“The accident occurred while the reactor was being tested at low loading…During the test…a runaway condition developed during which the power generation reached over 100 times the design capacity … As a result of the explosion and fire, 20 million curies of radioactivity were released, an amount which is 30 times the nuclear fallout that occurred at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.”

Since the tragedy, the International Atomic Energy Agency formed a nuclear safety group to advise on safety approaches and policies.


Thermogalvanic Effect: Harnessing Waste Heat

By: Kaylee Verhoeven

The discovery of fire was a turning point in human history, it offered portable warmth, light, protection, and a new way of preparing food. It was also one of mankind’s most successful attempts to harness energy. Because energy is almost always lost in the harvesting phase, researchers around the world have spent decades seeking ways to harness this wasted energy.

Researchers at MIT and Stanford have found a new way to transform waste heat into electricity. Electricity is considered high-grade energy because it can be converted into other forms of energy for use and storage without significant losses. Thermal energy is low-grade energy, which means that attempts to transform heat back into other forms of energy is costly and inefficient. Most of the time, thermal energy is written off as waste heat and released into the environment. Converting low-grade energy back into high-grade energy is an uphill battle, but there are new thermoelectric products that could be our best bet. Efficient and low-cost thermal energy-harvesting systems are needed to utilize the tremendous low-grade heat sources.

The new technology uses available materials and could be used to recycle the large amounts of wasted heat generated in industrial processes and electric power plants. The new system allows waste heat to raise the temperature of a battery, and thanks to the thermogalvanic effect, the battery can now be charged at a lower voltage than would normally be required. The battery is then cooled down, and because the charging voltage is lower at high temperatures than at low temperatures, once it has cooled the battery can deliver more electricity than what was used to charge it. That extra energy, of course, does not just appear from nowhere: it comes from the heat that was added to the system.

Imagine the potential of thermoelectric-powered devices, Engineers are working diligently to find the most cost-effective approach and I don’t know about you but just the possibility of charging a cell phone by using body heat is something to look forward to!

DO YOU NEED ENGINEERING PDHs? offers online PDH credits based on modern articles written by professional engineers.

The Plastic Strategy

By: Kaylee Verhoeven

The great plastic debate - not only in politics but also in everyday conversations people are demanding we save the environment. Many argue that the world should do away with all plastic use, which unfortunately is not realistic. Plastic is necessary for highly perishable foods as well as high moisture content products. It is widely known that the plastic consumption of the world is out of control but, if we were to stop using plastics for food, the amount of food spoilage would be over 20-times the waste of the packaging. The creation of new technology is required if we want to do more than just clean up the mountains of plastic waste and hope the next generation is more considerate in their consumer-driven lives.

Despite the challenges related to plastic waste, demand continues to grow. Engineering goals have started to shift toward a new plastic strategy: bioplastics. The traditional biodegradable plastics just are not degrading fast enough to keep up with demand. To understand the difference between the two types of plastics, clarifying the terms will help:

Bio-based plastics are all about renewable raw materials. Renewable raw materials such as sugar, corn, or wheat are used to create the plastic. Polylactic acid (PLA) is a good example: it is a 100% bio-based plastic and today mostly produced from corn. In contrast, biodegradable plastics have been designed to decompose and degrade under the right conditions, for example, when in contact with soil, compost or even water.

Engineers are committed to finding renewables that are still durable, recyclable, and reusable. Already bio-based plastics are being used in car parts, packaging, even children’s toys. The next step engineers are trying to achieve on an industrial scale is using these plastics as a renewable diesel. They are taking waste plastic and turning it back into a raw material for fossil refining. To do so plastics are either chemically or mechanically recycled. Mechanical recycling reduces the plastic into granules, but it cannot be reused for food packaging as there are impurities. Chemical recycling breaks the plastic down into a liquid similar to crude oil. These plastics are free of impurities making this process the optimal choice.

Environmentalists have been raising awareness for a plastic-free future. One such movement is saving sea turtles by switching from plastic straws to paper ones. While filled with good intention this effort completely defeats the purpose. By switching to paper, it requires more trees to be cut down which results in decreased oxygen (that vital substance) needed by every living creature on the planet. The practice of conservation is a good one, and engineers have been hard at work securing a better future by creating a way to reuse the plastics we recycle.

DO YOU NEED ENGINEERING PDHs? offers online PDH credits based on modern articles written by professional engineers.

Scientists Find New Behavior of Water

By: Kaylee Verhoeven

Scroll Up